Individual Soul or not in Japanese Buddhism?


Individual Soul or not in Japanese Buddhism?

by Luiz


One of the most difficult questions in Buddhism is the existence and permanence of an individual soul, even when that existence is taken in a relativistic way. I have been seeing the most paradoxical opinions – some schools say that once the external body goes, individuality goes along with it, some say that a personal soul takes birth again to continue its evolution, others state that what is reborn has no direct personal link with the former being, and others still affirm nothing similar to a singular soul could ever exist. What should I believe in?

****My answer****

I cannot answer for all school of Buddhism and that is why I will tell you what I learned and what I believe in, according to Japanese Buddhism.

First, you must understand that Buddhism is influenced and modified by the different places it settles to. The purer form of Buddhism, closer to what the historical would have preached is Theravada, as practices in Sri Lanka, India etc.

Buddhism in Japan has been first influenced by its passage through China and Korea, bringing with it its modifications and then by Shintoism, the native religion of Japan.

In Shintoism, the human individual has many souls. (3 or 4 depending on the source) Each soul has a role in the body and each will accomplish something once the body dies. Some souls will join the “general consciousness” and other can be reincarnated.

It is my understanding that this explains why some people would be able to communicate with the souls of dead people and at the same time why more than one person could be the reincarnation of an individual (funny how individual comes from indivisible, or “which cannot be split”)

In the Esoteric Schools of Buddhism, which was heavily influenced by Shintoism, the soul of the deceased is generally severed from the illusion of individuality (we would actually be dreaming our lives) and return to the ultimate collective consciousness that is the Universe.

After a while, we are re-born and restart the cycle, depending on the Karma we accumulated.

Buddhist who are more advanced in the cycle, become more in-tuned with the universe and are able to retain more individuality when they die. Meaning that a very advanced master would be able to return to life through rebirth with some memories and knowledge to carry-on his work without having to start over from zero.

One supposed such master is the Dalai Lama.

Then there are those who become free of the cycle upon their death and do not need to be reborn. Some say they are reborn in the Western paradise and others say that they just cease to be reborn. They are joined with the Universe.

One of the conditions of suffering is birth. If one is not born, he will not suffer.

Thus, to put my answer in a concise paragraph, from my understanding, all the answers you mention are valid. It all depends on the evolution of the “soul”.

It is a very confusing question and I would recommend that you get the complete answer from scholars who did deep researches on the subject. I recommend Death and the Afterlife in Japanese Buddhism.

I do hope it answers your question.

Comments for Individual Soul or not in Japanese Buddhism?

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Mar 14, 2012

What Is The Soul…

by: Bronco

Hello there Luiz…

Think back as far as you can, even into childhood, and ask yourself the question, where did all of that intuitive awareness, or instinct come from. We learn nothing we just become aware of what we know, is a master tantra for me, mind blowing indeed…

Soul, no soul confuses us all as attempt to grasp the truth of why we are here, and for what purpose. In my early studies of Buddhism, they were teaching me what I already knew somehow. which made the relative tantra absolutely right. Therefore, I had no choice but to continue my studies…

Everything I read, no matter which style of Buddhism, Taoism, Zen, Tai Chi, they all made sense, and yet, I had no idea how or from where. I attempted to separate each and every mode of teaching, it became impossible, they were all relative insparably…

Anatta, no soul, self or ego, I found that confusing to define what are we then, were my concerns. The revelation at the beginning of this Hugo, blog site, became my answer after many years of slight concern. All that has gone, there is no difference between either apart from impermanence of all phenomena. The forever changing pattern of existence, non existence…

God, Consciousness, Param Attman, Nirvana, Heaven, Enlightenment, Soul, Universal self, Subtle self. For me, are all the very same inseparable dimension. No more concerns or frustrations, just clarity of mind, the one mind, to which is a process. The brain, is the physical process of the Absolute mind, inseparably. This is why I beleive that, Buddhism, is a science of all existence, non existence, and not so much a religion, but then again does it matter, no it does not, it just is…

Wherever we go, the breath is the same, whatever we think, the thoughts are the same, albeit not at the same time like breathing. There is only one enlightenment, not segregation by the belief system. This is what our awareness is, which only opens as we become realised, again the Absolute is the only dimension which will know when that time is right. Identical to all the seasons which all come with change…Satsasng..Bronco

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It’s easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Ask me something.